MCVICKER v. KNIGHT PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC.
| CHRISTINA MCVICKER |
| KNIGHT PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC. |
| 2:2011cv00245 |
| February 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Westmoreland |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND JUDGMENT ORDER. Judgment is entered, in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant, in the amount of $65,872.81. Specifically, the Court awards $9,689.13 in backpay, $25,000.00 in compensatory damages and $31,183.68 in attorney's fees and costs. The Court, having resolved all matters before it, will enter herewith an Order under Federal Rule 58 and mark this case closed. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 3/19/15. (dcd)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER. At today's Conference, counsel for Defendant has advised that he has been unable to contact his client, that his fees have not been paid and that he likely will be moving to withdraw his appearance. The Court advised counsel that, shoul d he be permitted to withdraw, the Defendant-corporation cannot proceed in federal court "pro se." If Defendant's counsel determines that he will move to withdraw his appearance, he shall do so by 3/7/14. In addition, a telephone hear ing/status conference is set for 3/18/14 at 2:00 p.m. If defense counsel moves to withdraw, the session will be a hearing on that motion, and a representative of the corporate-Defendant is ordered to participate. If defense counsel does not move to withdraw, the session on 3/18/14 will be a status conference to discuss how this case will proceed. For the 3/18/14 hearing/conference, all participants shall contact the undersigned's Chambers on a single telephone line, and Defendant's counsel shall coordinate the call. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 3/4/14. (dcd)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER. Consistent with Defendant's filing at Doc. 40 , the Court has confirmed that Defendant has filed a Voluntary Petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. See In re Knight Protective Service, Inc., 12-011011 (PM) (Bankr. D. Md., Greenbelt Div.). Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, the claims against Defendant are STAYED, and this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 1/30/12. (dcd)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying 5 Request for Default Judgment and setting aside 6 Clerk's Entry of Default. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 5/10/11. (map)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MCVICKER v. KNIGHT PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CHRISTINA MCVICKER | |
| Represented By: | Samuel J. Cordes |
| Represented By: | Christine T. Elzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KNIGHT PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
