RICHETTI v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, INC.
Plaintiff: LEAH C. RICHETTI
Defendant: SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, INC.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00256
Filed: February 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Cathy Bissoon
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Schwab
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER denying 53 Motion for Summary Judgment and adopting Report and Recommendation 63 dated May 28, 2013. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 7/18/2013. (acs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RICHETTI v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, INC.
Represented By: James P. Hollihan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LEAH C. RICHETTI
Represented By: Margaret J. Fried
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?