DOUGLAS v. VIHIDAL et al
Plaintiff: LAMAR NELSON DOUGLAS
Defendant: IRMA VIHIDAL, JOHN MCANANY, LINDA VARNER, BIONJAK JIN, MIKE HICE, BRUCE POKOL, PETER VIDONISH, R. SMITH, TISSUE, COWAN, LORINDA WINFIELD, THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LOUIS FOLINO and NEDRA RICE-GREGO
Case Number: 2:2011cv00350
Filed: March 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: Cathy Bissoon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 188 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER GRANTING DR. JIN'S Objection to 186 Proposed Jury Instructions filed by LAMAR NELSON DOUGLAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 5/13/2014. (MJL)
May 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 181 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 172 Motion in Limine; granting 174 Motion in Limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 5/6/2014. (MJL)
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 163 ORDER denying 135 Motion in Limine; denying 137 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 139 Motion in Limine; granting 141 Motion in Limine; denying 143 Motion in Limine; denying 145 Motion in Limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 3/20/2014. (MJL)
March 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 126 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 116 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 3/3/2014. (MJL)
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 115 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re 91 MOTION for Summary Judgment Against Defendant Jin filed by LAMAR NELSON DOUGLAS, 83 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MIKE HICE, BYUNGHAK JIN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 1/27/2014. (MJL)
May 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER DENYING 21 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 17 Motion to Dismiss; and ADOPTING 35 Report and Recommendation as the Opinion of this Court. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 05/29/12. (eca)
October 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to file Plaintiff's proposed amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' 5 and 8 pending Mot ions to Dismiss are DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Defendants filing new motions to dismiss, if appropriate, on or before November 9, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 13 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cathy Bissoon on 10/18/2011. A copy of this Order was mailed to Plaintiff at his address of record. (dad)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DOUGLAS v. VIHIDAL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAMAR NELSON DOUGLAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IRMA VIHIDAL
Represented By: Douglas B. Barbour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN MCANANY
Represented By: Douglas B. Barbour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LINDA VARNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BIONJAK JIN
Represented By: Kathryn M. Kenyon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MIKE HICE
Represented By: Kathryn M. Kenyon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRUCE POKOL
Represented By: Douglas B. Barbour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PETER VIDONISH
Represented By: Douglas B. Barbour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. SMITH
Represented By: Douglas B. Barbour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TISSUE
Represented By: Douglas B. Barbour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COWAN
Represented By: Douglas B. Barbour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LORINDA WINFIELD
Represented By: Douglas B. Barbour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Douglas B. Barbour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOUIS FOLINO
Represented By: Douglas B. Barbour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEDRA RICE-GREGO
Represented By: Douglas B. Barbour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?