JONES v. ROBINSON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
AARON MICHAEL JONES |
BRADLEY MERMON, DALE VIETMEIER, ANDREW BRUGGMAN, ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL, ROBINSON TOWNSHIP EMS SERVICE, GAGE, LANE, TRACY DAVIS, CYNDI SANTIAGO and JAMES M. ECKER |
2:2011cv00361 |
March 21, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Susan Paradise Baxter |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, ORDER granting 77 Motion to Dismiss filed by ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL, granting 62 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by JAMES M. ECKER, granting 59 Motion to Dismiss filed by ROBINSON TOWNSHI P EMS SERVICE, granting 53 Motion to Dismiss, dismissing as moot Motion for More Definite Statement filed by DALE VIETMEIER, BRADLEY MERMON. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 3/12/2012. [A copy of the Opinion and Order was mailed to Plaintiff on this day at his current address of record]. (bb) |
Filing 106 ORDER granting 53 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 53 Motion for More Definite Statement; granting 59 Motion to Dismiss; granting[] Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 77 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 3/12/2012. [Acopy of the Opinion and Order was mailed to Plaintiff on this day at his current address of record]. (bb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.