ANDERSON v. TAGGART GLOBAL, LLC
Plaintiff: THOMAS WILLIAM ANDERSON
Defendant: TAGGART GLOBAL, LLC
Case Number: 2:2011cv00656
Filed: May 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Schwab
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 623
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 11 MOTION to Dismiss re 1 Complaint filed by TAGGART GLOBAL, LLC. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 08/31/2011. (lmt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ANDERSON v. TAGGART GLOBAL, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS WILLIAM ANDERSON
Represented By: Richard A. Porach
Represented By: Zan Ivan Hodzic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TAGGART GLOBAL, LLC
Represented By: Denise R. Abbott
Represented By: Avrum Levicoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?