DURHAM v. VARANO, et al
| GEORGE M. DURHAM |
| THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BEAVER and DAVID A. VARANO |
| 2:2011cv00719 |
| June 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Northumberland |
| Robert C. Mitchell |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re 90 MOTION Rule 60 (b) Motion filed by GEORGE M. DURHAM dismissing motion as a successive petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 08/05/2016. (Mitchell, Robert)
|
|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re 83 MOTION for Rule 60(b) Relief re 73 Memorandum Opinion & Order, filed by GEORGE M. DURHAM dismissing motion and denying a certificate of appealability as a successive petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 07/05/2016. (Mitchell, Robert)
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re 47 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by GEORGE M. DURHAM, 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by GEORGE M. DURHAM dismissing them and denying a certificate of appealability. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 08/24/2015. (Mitchell, Robert)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
