PATROSKI v. RIDGE et al
SUSAN PATROSKI |
PRESSLEY RIDGE FOUNDATION, B. SCOTT FINNELL and PRESSLEY RIDGE |
B. SCOTT FINNELL |
SUSAN PATROSKI |
2:2011cv01065 |
August 16, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Terrence F. McVerry |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to Compel Production of Documents by Party B. Scott Finnell; and granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to Compel Production of Documents by Pressley Ridge. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 11/20/2011. (bsc) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 30 Plaintiff's Motion for Order Compelling Timely Mailing of Documents; and denying without prejudice 35 Defendants' Motion for Appointment of Special Discovery Master. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 11/17/2011. (bsc) |
Filing 28 ORDER denying 21 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/21/2011. (bsc) |
Filing 25 ORDER granting 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Complaint filed against Pressley Ridge Foundation is dismissed with prejudice. On or before November 1, 2011, Plaintiff may either file an Amended Complaint or file a notice of her intent to stand on the Complaint as filed.Signed by Judge Terrence F. McVerry on 10/18/2011. (bsc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.