RICHARD et al v. JOLLIE et al
| THOMAS P. RICHARD, SR. |
| BARBARA JOLLIE, JUDI PETRUSH, MICHAEL PACEK, THOMAS GRACE, JOHN PECK, JOHN BLEHOVEC and DAVID PATTERSON |
| 2:2011cv01075 |
| August 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Montgomery |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| Robert C. Mitchell |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 6 Report and Recommendations. After the plaintiff filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties f ourteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by Plaintiff/Petitioner Thomas Richard, and upon independent review of the motions and the record, and upon consideration o f the magistrate judge=s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6 ), which is adopted, as amended by this memorandum opinion and order, as the opinion of this court, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff/Petitioners Hazel-Atlas action (ECF No. 2 ) is transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit forthwith as a successive petition. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/5/2011. (smc ) Modified on 10/5/2011. SEE ERRATA - DOCUMENT MISSING SIGNATURE.(smc )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
