JOHNSON et al v. DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING L.L.C
Plaintiff: DERRICK J. JOHNSON, F & J HOLDINGS, INC. and CHARLES THOMPSON
Defendant: DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING L.L.C
Case Number: 2:2011cv01117
Filed: August 31, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Nora Barry Fischer
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 135 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, Dunkin's Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint 99 , Motion for Summary Judgment on PBD's Third Amended Complaint 102 , and Motion to Strike 132 are granted and Plaintiffs' Partial Motion for Summary Judgment 105 is denied. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/30/14. (jg)
May 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, Dunkin's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 25 is granted and Dunkin's Motion to Dismiss Intervenor Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 31 is gra nted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the Court holds that: Dunkin's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Johnson, Thompson and F &J's promissory estoppel claims is granted. Said claims are dismissed, without prejudice, to filing a seco nd amended complaint against Dunkin'; Dunkin's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Johnson, Thompson and F & J's § 1981 claims is granted. Said claims are dismissed, with prejudice; Dunkin's Motion to Dismiss Intervenor Plaintiff s PBD and Gandy's promissory estoppel claim is denied; Dunkin's Motion to Dismiss Gandy's § 1981 claim is granted. Said claim is dismissed, with prejudice. Dunkin's Motion to Dismiss PBD's § 1981 claim is granted. Said claim is dismissed, without prejudice, to filing a second amended complaint against Dunkin'. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 5/18/12. (jg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JOHNSON et al v. DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING L.L.C
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISING L.L.C
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DERRICK J. JOHNSON
Represented By: Erik M. Yurkovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: F & J HOLDINGS, INC.
Represented By: Erik M. Yurkovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLES THOMPSON
Represented By: Erik M. Yurkovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?