MANOS v. ASTRUE

MANOS v. ASTRUE

Plaintiff:	SHERYL MANOS
Defendant:	MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number:	2:2011cv01147
Filed:	September 9, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
County:	Allegheny
Presiding Judge:	Gary L. Lancaster
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 4, 2012	Filing 17 ORDER granting 14 Petition for Award of Attorney's Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act; Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of $3,514.51; These attorney fees will be paid directly to Plaintiff, and sen t to the business address of Plaintiff's counsel; Full or partial remittance of the awarded attorney fees will be contingent upon a determination by the Government that Plaintiff owes no qualifying, pre-existing debt(s) to the Government; If such a debt(s) exists, the Government will reduce the awarded attorney fees in this Order to the extent necessary to satisfy such debt(s). Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/4/12. (map)
May 11, 2012	Filing 12 MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 10 Motion for Summary Judgment; The decision of the ALJ is hereby vacated and this case is remanded for reconsideration not inconsistent with the instant opinion. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 5/11/12. (map)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 4, 2012

Filing 17 ORDER granting 14 Petition for Award of Attorney's Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act; Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of $3,514.51; These attorney fees will be paid directly to Plaintiff, and sen t to the business address of Plaintiff's counsel; Full or partial remittance of the awarded attorney fees will be contingent upon a determination by the Government that Plaintiff owes no qualifying, pre-existing debt(s) to the Government; If such a debt(s) exists, the Government will reduce the awarded attorney fees in this Order to the extent necessary to satisfy such debt(s). Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/4/12. (map)

May 11, 2012

Filing 12 MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 10 Motion for Summary Judgment; The decision of the ALJ is hereby vacated and this case is remanded for reconsideration not inconsistent with the instant opinion. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 5/11/12. (map)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MANOS v. ASTRUE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHERYL MANOS
Represented By:	Kelie C. Schneider
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?