UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. DIANA SALVATORE et al v. FLEMING et al
2:2011cv01157 |
September 12, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Cynthia Reed Eddy |
Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 84 MEMORANDUM ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Fleming's 37 Motion to Dismiss and Strike the Amended Complaint, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Fleming shall file a responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint on or before 4/16/15. It is further ORDERED that 69 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the Opinion of the Court, as modified by this Order. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 3/25/15. (bdb) |
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting 45 Motion to Set Aside Default; granting 51 Motion to Set Aside Default. Dixie Realty shall file its proposed Answer, Defenses and Crossclaims within 7 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 12/12/2014. (bap) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. DIANA SALVATORE et al v. FLEMING et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.