TOPLAK v. BABCOCK & WILCOX TECHNICAL SERVICE GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff: GARY PAUL TOPLAK
Defendant: BABCOCK & WILCOX TECHNICAL SERVICE GROUP, INC.
Case Number: 2:2011cv01493
Filed: November 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Beaver
Presiding Judge: Cathy Bissoon
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER granting 35 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 9/27/2013. (sje)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TOPLAK v. BABCOCK & WILCOX TECHNICAL SERVICE GROUP, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GARY PAUL TOPLAK
Represented By: Jean E. Novak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BABCOCK & WILCOX TECHNICAL SERVICE GROUP, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?