LEWIS et al v. ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORPORATION et al
| LARRY LEWIS, KURT SZYMANSKI and ROBERT KLUGH, SR. |
| ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORPORATION and ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED |
| 2:2011cv01619 |
| December 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
170
ORDER granting 158 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. As set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion and order, defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The clerk shall mark the case closed. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/2/2013. (dmm) Modified on 8/2/2013 (corrected typo) (dmm)
|
|
Filing
108
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 77 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the reasons set forth in the attached memorandum opinion and order, the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 77 ) is granted. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice to the plaintiff filing an amended complaint on or before 4/30/2012. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 4/17/2012. (tcg)
|
|
Filing
67
Memorandum Opinion and Order This case, including Plaintiffs' pending motion, will be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 12/21/2011. (S,L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
