COULTER v. STUDENY et al
| JEAN COULTER |
| CHRISTINE STUDENY, OFFICE OF THE BUTLER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, JEREMY STEWART, DENNIS HOERNER, THOMAS FORREST, THOMAS EIDENMULLER and WILLIAM R. SHAFFER |
| 2:2012cv00060 |
| January 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Philadelphia |
| Robert C. Mitchell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 48 Motion to Stay; denying 48 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 48 Motion for Recusal, as more fully stated in the Order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/14/2012. (dad)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying 41 Plaintiff's Petition for Recusal and Petition for Reconsideration under Rule 59. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a rule to show cause is issued against Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall, on or before November 23, 2012, show good cause why sanctions should not be entered against her pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for filing numerous motions that she knows are without merit. Plaintiff also shall show good cause why a vexatious litigant order should not be entered against her. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on the above show cause order is scheduled for December 17, 2012, at 10:30 a.m., before the undersigned, in Courtroom 9A of the United States Courthouse in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. As more fully stated in the Order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 11/8/2012. A copy of this Order was mailed to Plaintiff at her address of record. (dad)
|
|
Filing
39
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docs. 28 , 30 , and 33 ) are GRANTED and this civil action is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent that Plaintiff's objections (Doc. 38 ) may be construed as a m otion for recusal, the same is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 37 ), as it is modified by this memorandum order, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 10/12/2012. A copy of this Order was mailed to Plaintiff at her address of record. (dad)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying w/ 24 Motion for Special Relief; denying w/ 24 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 7/10/2012. (spc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
