HAIRSTON v. FOLINO et al
KENNETH HAIRSTON |
LOUIS FOLINO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2012cv00313 |
March 15, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Greene |
Robert C. Mitchell |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 25 as the opinion of the court; that the petitioner's motion to alter or amend judgment (ECF 12 ) is granted; that the amended petition of Kenneth Hairston for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF 16 ) is gr anted; and that the Commonwealth is directed to reinstate the petitioners appellate rights in the Pennsylvania appellate courts; that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the F.R.App.P., if the petitioner desires to appeal from this Order, he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 F.R.App.P. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/6/12. (jg) |
Filing 10 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 5 as the opinion of the Court; that the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner 4 is dismissed and a certificate of appealability is denied; that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the Petitioner desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/4/12. (jg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.