AQUATECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION et al v. N.A. WATER SYSTEMS, LLC et al
DEBASISH MUKHOPADHYAY and AQUATECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION |
N.A. WATER SYSTEMS, LLC and VEOLIA WATER SOLUTIONS & TECHNOLOGIES SUPPORT |
2:2012cv00435 |
April 4, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Washington |
Joy Flowers Conti |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 33 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(1) AND 12(b)(6) filed by VEOLIA WATER SOLUTIONS & TECHNOLOGIES SUPPORT, N.A. WATER SYSTEMS, LLC. As set forth in the accompanying memor andum opinion and order, it is HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion with respect to counts one, two and three will be GRANTED, and plaintiffs' second amended complaint will be dismissed without prejudice to the extent that plaintiffs may file a new complaint if defendants, in the future, threaten to assert or assert claims of infringement in derogation of the four covenants not to sue. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the court finds that plaintiffs' claim for tortious interference re lates back to the date of the initial filing of plaintiffs' complaint in this court and will GRANT the motion to dismiss with respect to count four without prejudice to it being asserted in an appropriate Pennsylvania court. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/31/2013. (dmm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.