ELCHIK v. AKUSTICA, INC et al
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ELCHIK
Defendant: AKUSTICA, INC, ROBERT BOSCH LLC, ROBERT BOSCH NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
Case Number: 2:2012cv00578
Filed: May 1, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Lisa Pupo Lenihan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 11 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renew it in accordance with this Court's previous Orders and as set forth in the Report and Recommend ation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 5 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT as to Plaintiff's voluntarily withdrawn claims for violation of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act; GRANTED as to Plaintiff's third-party-beneficiary claim for brea ch of contract against Akustica; and DENIED as to Plaintiff's claim for violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, against the Defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 64 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Cou rt, except as to that portion of the Report and Recommendation set forth at pages 15 to 25 inclusive as relating to the inherent authority of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to issue a Notice of Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 4/5/13. (bdb)
January 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION. For the reasons stated within, the Defendants' appeal/objections of and to the Chief Magistrate Judge's Order are overruled, and that Order is affirmed/adopted by this Court. An appropriate Order will issue. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 1/3/13. (bdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ELCHIK v. AKUSTICA, INC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ELCHIK
Represented By: Richard J. Cromer
Represented By: David E. Renner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AKUSTICA, INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT BOSCH LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT BOSCH NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?