SALVATI et al v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, N.A. et al
| GENE W. SALVATI and OLIVIA JONES |
| DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS SERVICING, ONEWEST BANK, F.S.B. and MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C. |
| 2:2012cv00971 |
| July 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Maureen P. Kelly |
| Arthur J. Schwab |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
219
ORDER denying 218 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 5/8/2018. A copy of this Order has been mailed to Mr. Boldrini at his address of record. (ndf)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER - Motion to Dismiss submitted on behalf of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, ECF No. 76 , is GRANTED and the remaining claims against Defendant Deutsche brought at Counts I and II of the Complaint are dismissed. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendations re 79 . Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 12/15/14. (lck)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER adopting in part and rejecting in part 46 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations; granting 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 3/28/2013. (lmt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
