COULTER v. RAMSDEN et al
Plaintiff: JEAN COULTER
Defendant: BUTLER COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES, RAPHAEL, RAMSDEN & BEHERS, DENNIS MCCURDY, SUSAN LOPE, ELIZABETH SMITH, MARY SUZANNE RAMSDEN, STEPHANIE ANDERSON, THOMAS DOERR and ROCHELLE GRAHAM
Case Number: 2:2012cv01050
Filed: July 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 13 Praecipe to Waive Oral Argument is DENIED, as stated above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel appearing at the December 17, 2012, hearing shall submit motions for costs and fees, along with supporting documentation, on or before December 28, 2012, if appropriate. Plaintiff shall file her responses thereto on or before January 9, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Coulter v. Ramsden, No. 12-1050, is DISMISSED, with PREJUDICE, as duplicative. IT I S FURTHER ORDERED that Coulter v. Mahood, No. 12-1241, is DISMISSED, with PREJUDICE, as duplicative. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is designated a vexatious litigant, and is prohibited from filing any additional civil actions related to or ar ising from the state court proceedings involving her criminal conviction for assaulting her minor child, and/or the subsequent termination of her parental rights. Given Plaintiffs history of ignoring the orders of this Court, the following procedure shall be implemented by the Clerks Office with respect to any documents filed by Plaintiff in the future: (1) The Clerk's Office shall file any documents submitted by Plaintiff in due course. Plaintiff shall remain responsible for any applicab le filing fees. (2) Plaintiff's filings shall then be submitted to the undersigned for screening. This Court will strike any filings that are in violation of this order. (3) Any filings that do not run afoul of this order, as determined by th is Court, will be allowed to remain on the docket, and will be assigned in accordance with Clerk's Office procedures in the same manner as filings submitted by a litigant who is not subject to a vexatious litigant order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at any violations of the above vexatious litigant order by Plaintiff will result in the imposition of sanctions and a possible order holding Plaintiff in contempt of court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent that any future filings by Plainti ff are appropriate, Plaintiff shall refrain from the use of abusive language. Consistent with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff also shall not file any motions that she knows to be without merit. Failure to comply with this order will result in the imposition of sanctions and a possible order holding Plaintiff in contempt of court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall comply with any and all orders of this Court. Failure to do so will result in the imposition of sanctions and a possible order holding Plaintiff in contempt of court. In the event that any future order conflicts with the above vexatious litigant order, the later order will control. As more fully stated in the Order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/18/2012. A copy of this Order was mailed to Plaintiff at her address of record. (dad)
December 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying 11 Motion to Stay; denying 11 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 11 Motion for Recusal. As more fully stated in the Order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/14/2012. A copy of this Order was mailed to Plaintiff at her address of record. Additionally, a voicemail message was left at Plaintiff's telephone number of record confirming that the hearing scheduled for 12/17/2012 would not be stayed. (dad)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COULTER v. RAMSDEN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BUTLER COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAPHAEL, RAMSDEN & BEHERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DENNIS MCCURDY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUSAN LOPE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ELIZABETH SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARY SUZANNE RAMSDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEPHANIE ANDERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THOMAS DOERR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROCHELLE GRAHAM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEAN COULTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?