JAHODA v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
| ROBERT JAHODA |
| FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2012cv01503 |
| October 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Beaver |
| David S. Cercone |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JAHODA v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ROBERT JAHODA | |
| Represented By: | R. Bruce Carlson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA | |
| Represented By: | Carolyn Batz McGee |
| Represented By: | April M. Hincy |
| Represented By: | Dorothy A. Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
