FANTONE v. LATINI et al
| PHILLIP LEE FANTONE |
| FRED LATINI, JOE BURGER, RON MACKEY, DANIEL BURNS, ROCHELLE ROSEN and PHILLIP BALK |
| 2:2012cv01691 |
| November 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Adams |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER granting 79 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 12/8/2015. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER denying 70 Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 7/31/2015. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting 33 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice as a matter of law. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 08/08/2013. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 36 Motion to Add Additional Counts because Plaintiff is given an extension of time in which he may amend the amended complaint to include the new Fifth Amendment claim or to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss no later than June 14, 2013. Defendants shall file a Reply to Plaintiff's response on or before July 1, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 05/24/2013. (bsc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
