SADELMYER v. PELTZER et al
MARIANNE SADELMYER |
LEVERNE ROSSI FACILITY NURSE, SERGENT CHIPPS, WARDEN J. PELTZER, DEPUTY WARDEN TEAMUS and FACILITY DOCTOR ISLEY, M.D. |
2:2012cv01785 |
December 7, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Cynthia Reed Eddy |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 56 Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Washington County Defendants and granting 60 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Doctor Isley, M.D. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 11/25/2014. (bsc) |
Filing 51 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion To Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) in the form of a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Warden J. Peltzer, Deputy Warden Teamus, Leverne Rossi, Facility Nurse, and Sergeant Chipps. The County Defendants shall file an Answer in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A). Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 04/14/2014. (bsc) |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant Matthew Eisley, M.D. See Opinion for details.Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 09/04/2013. (bsc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.