VINSICK v. RJM ACQUISITIONS, LLC

Defendant: RJM ACQUISITIONS, LLC
Plaintiff: JOHN VINSICK
Case Number: 2:2012cv01792
Filed: December 7, 2012
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Beaver
Presiding Judge: Cathy Bissoon
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 14, 2013 9 Opinion or Order of the Court As more fully stated in the attached ORDER, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to state court 6 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 1/14/2013. A copy of this order mailed to Plaintiff on 1/14/2013. (acs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VINSICK v. RJM ACQUISITIONS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RJM ACQUISITIONS, LLC
Represented By: Danielle M. Vugrinovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN VINSICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.