SPENCE v. SCHAFER et al
| ROBERT RUSSELL SPENCE, JR. |
| DALEENA JOHNSON, PENN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, GOMBACH TOWING, KEELEY SCHAFER, KEVIN SCHAFER, SALLY FRICK, LOCK, ROBERT J. STECHP, CANDICE THOMPSON, CHASITY THOMPSON and DONNA STAPLES |
| 2:2013cv00016 |
| January 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Beaver |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM ORDER directing that plaintiff's second amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to the malpractice claim against ROBERT STECHP and dismissed without prejudice as to all remaining claims and defendants. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a third amended complaint as directed therein within 21 days of date of this order (4/23/13). Further directing that following motions are denied: 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction against Korry Pitts and 412 Motoring; 9 Motio n for Preliminary Injunction against Cortorra Borwnfield; 10] Motion for Preliminary Injunction against Keeley Schafer and Kevin Schafer; 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction against Chastity Thompson; and 12 Motion for TRO against Keeley Schafter and Kevin Schafer. Further ordered that the 13 Report and Recommendation of Judge Lenihan is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 4/2/13. (njt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
