NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP, INC. v. JOHN DOE NOS. 1-5

Plaintiff: NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP, INC.
Defendant: MARJORIE ADAMS and JOHN DOE NOS. 2-5
Case Number: 2:2013cv00053
Filed: January 10, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Schwab
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP, INC. v. JOHN DOE NOS. 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP, INC.
Represented By: Tara L. Maczuzak
Represented By: William Dunnegan
Represented By: Ella Aiken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARJORIE ADAMS
Represented By: Cecilia R. Dickson
Represented By: Anthony William Brooks
Represented By: Anthony W. Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE NOS. 2-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.