THOMAS-TAYLOR v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, BUREAU OF POLICE
Plaintiff: CATHY A. THOMAS-TAYLOR
Defendant: CITY OF PITTSBURGH, BUREAU OF POLICE
Case Number: 2:2013cv00164
Filed: January 31, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Joy Flowers Conti
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 79 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 45 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE FORT PITT LODGE NO. 1, 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by CITY OF PITTSBURGH. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/18/2014. (blr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THOMAS-TAYLOR v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, BUREAU OF POLICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CATHY A. THOMAS-TAYLOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF PITTSBURGH, BUREAU OF POLICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?