EXCENTUS CORPORATION v. GIANT EAGLE, INC et al
EXCENTUS CORPORATION |
DAVID SHAPIRA, DANIEL SHAPIRA and GIANT EAGLE, INC |
2:2013cv00178 |
February 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Joy Flowers Conti |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 208 OPINION setting forth the reasons the motion for reconsideration 143 , motion to strike 157 , and motion to stay 158 will be DENIED. An appropriate order will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/10/14. (kjm) |
Filing 183 OPINION setting forth the reasons 91 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. An appropriate order will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 3/24/14. (kjm) |
Filing 180 MEMORANDUM OPINION re motion to sever and transfer 147 and motion to stay 160 . An appropriate order will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 3/10/14. (kjm) |
Filing 141 MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the reasons set forth in this opinion, Giant Eagle, Inc's motion for reconsideration 129 is granted. An appropriate order will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 12/12/13. (kjm) |
Filing 125 MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 106 , and denying, without prejudice, 107 and 110 as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 11/26/13. An appropriate order will follow. (kjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.