BLACK et al v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
| DEBRA BLACK and EARL BLACK |
| ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ALLEGHENY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, WILLIAM S. STICKMAN, III, DANA PHILLIPS, MICHAEL PATTERSON, LUCILLE AIKEN, KIM WILSON, TRACY HARTEL, CHRIS MARSH, VALERIE SLEPSKY and JOHN AND JANE DOES |
| 2:2013cv00179 |
| February 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
277
ORDER: Plaintiffs' 267 Motion to Strike the 266 Objections dated May 4, 2015 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' 271 Motion to Strike the 270 Objections dated May 5, 2015 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 5/7/2015. (bap)
|
|
Filing
255
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying the Medical Defendants' 252 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's 186 Order from 5/30/2014. All deadlines and obligations set forth in the 240 Pretrial Order remain in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 4/24/2015. (bap)
|
|
Filing
251
ORDER denying 245 Motion to Consolidate Cases. All deadlines and obligations set forth in the 240 Pretrial Order remain in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 4/20/2015. (bap)
|
|
Filing
238
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 201 Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions filed Plaintiffs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 10/30/2014. (bap)
|
|
Filing
229
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting plaintiffs' 151 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim and adopting 178 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Eddy as the Opinion of the Court. Counterclaim is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 9/5/14. (njt)
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 183 Motion to Strike Dr. Mendel's Expert Report. The Medical Defendants are prohibited from referencing or relying on Dr. Mendel's Expert Report for any purpose, including motions for summary judgment or at trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 05/30/2014. (bap)
|
|
Filing
175
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 161 Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1927. Plaintiffs shall submit to this Court a reasonable calculation of their excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees incurred as a result of Mr. Winikoff's intentional misconduct for which he will be personally liable on or before 5/13/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 05/06/2014. (bap)
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER striking 154 Motion to Dismiss and Strike and 155 Brief in Support; striking 156 Motion to Strike Request for Entry of a Default and 158 Brief in Support. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 04/22/2014. (bap)
|
|
Filing
116
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 109 Motion to Enforce Subpoena Against Sherry Anderson and Motion for Attorney's Fees and Expenses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 02/12/2014. (bap)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying defendant's 29 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and adopting 38 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Eddy as the opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 7/19/13. (njt)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying 32 Motion to Dismiss. It is further ORDERED that the Medical Defendants file a response to the Amended Complaint within fourteen days of the docketing of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 6/11/2013. (mjl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
