PANTHERA RAIL CAR LLC et al v. KASGRO RAIL CORPORATION et al
| PANTHERA LEASING, INC. and PANTHERA RAIL CAR LLC |
| KR LOGISTICS, LLC, KASGRO LEASING, LLC, KASGRO RAIL CORPORATION and KASGRO RAIL CAR MANAGEMENT, LLC |
| 2:2013cv00679 |
| May 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Maureen P. Kelly |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
169
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 154 MOTION to Intervene, filed by MAXUS CAPITAL GROUP, LLC. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 4/22/2014. (sje)
|
|
Filing
149
MEMORANDUM ORDER, indicating that for reasons stated within, Panthera's Motion to Compel 143 is granted. Defendants Kasgro Rail Corporation, Kasgro Leasing LLC and Kasgro Rail Car Management, LLC are compelled to respond to Panthera's Do cument Requests using the time period of 2000 to the present for Request Numbers 6, 8, 14 and 28, and the time period of 2005 to the present for all other Requests. The Kasgro Defendants shall maintain a privilege log detailing the confidential info rmation that is not produced; that the parties, through counsel, shall meet and confer in order to decide upon a Special Master who will hear any disputes that may arise regarding the remainder of fact discovery. The parties shall contact the agree d-upon Special Master and clear any conflicts of interest. The parties shall file a Joint Status Report with the Court providing the name and contact information for the Special Master no later than 3/12/14 at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/6/14. (jg)
|
|
Filing
131
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated within, KRL's Motion to Dismiss 113 is denied, in part, and granted, in part. Specifically, the Motion is denied with respect to (1) the alter ego doctrine; (2) fraud; (3) aiding and abett ing fraud; and (4) unfair competition. The Motion is granted with respect to Panthera's claim for civil conspiracy, and that claim is dismissed; With respect to the Kasgro Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 115 , California law governs each claim. The Court having found sufficient allegations of an alter ego theory, their Motion to Dismiss is denied. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/4/13. (jg)
|
|
Filing
105
OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated more fully within, KRL's motion to dismiss (Amended Complaint) 37 is granted, without prejudice. Consistent with the Court's Order on the record at the conclusion of the oral argument conducted on 8/5/13 98 , and the Text Order dated 8/16/13, Panthera is to submit a Second Amended Complaint that addresses the Court's concerns about the sufficiency of the pleadings raised in oral argument and outlined in this Opinion by 8/26/13, under the applicable law as set forth herein. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 8/21/13. (jg)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 37 40 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/13/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
