PONDEXTER v. PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION et al
| EARL A. PONDEXTER |
| JOHN JOYCE, FRANK AGGAZIO, THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, DIANE BLANCETT MADDOCK, LYLE M. WOOD, JOANN L. EDWARDS, GERALD S. ROBINSON, THOMAS CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION, THOMAS MCPOYLE, JAMES BULLS, JAMES T. ZAPF and DEBRA BREITENSTEIN |
| 2:2013cv00732 |
| May 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER indicating that, for reasons stated more fully within said Order, Plaintiff's "Motion for Reconsideration re Order Dismissing Case" 3 is denied. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/28/13. (jg)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER indicating that upon consideration of Plaintiff Earl A. Pondexter's Pro Se Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Docket No. 1 ), it is hereby ordered that said Motion 1 is granted as to the In Forma Pauperis Status of Pro Se Plaintiff E arl A. Pondexter only; that the above captioned matter is dismissed, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (details more fully stated in said Order); The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 5/29/13. (jg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
