SPENCE v. UNITED STATES

SPENCE v. UNITED STATES

Petitioner:	ROBERT R. SPENCE, JR.
Respondent:	UNITED STATES
Case Number:	2:2013cv01081
Filed:	July 25, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
County:	Beaver
Presiding Judge:	Lisa Pupo Lenihan
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 6, 2013	Filing 4 Pursuant to Petitioner's 3 Response to this Court's Order dated July 26, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall file Petitioner's Omnibus Habeas Corpus Motion in Petitioner's criminal case at Criminal Docket No. 2:09-cr-105 and CLOSE this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on August 6, 2013. (kcc)
July 26, 2013	Filing 2 ORDER that, no later than August 16, 2013, Petitioner shall return the attached form to the Court indicating whether he intended his Omnibus Habeas Corpus Motion to be filed in his criminal case at Criminal Docket No. 2:09-cr-105, whether he intended his Motion to be filed as a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, or whether he intended his Motion to be filed as a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Petitioner fails to return the form wi thin twenty-one (21) days, then this action will be dismissed for his failure to prosecute and his Omnibus Habeas Corpus Motion will not be filed in his criminal case at Criminal Docket No. 2:09-cr-105. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on July 26, 2013. (kcc)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 6, 2013

Filing 4 Pursuant to Petitioner's 3 Response to this Court's Order dated July 26, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall file Petitioner's Omnibus Habeas Corpus Motion in Petitioner's criminal case at Criminal Docket No. 2:09-cr-105 and CLOSE this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on August 6, 2013. (kcc)

July 26, 2013

Filing 2 ORDER that, no later than August 16, 2013, Petitioner shall return the attached form to the Court indicating whether he intended his Omnibus Habeas Corpus Motion to be filed in his criminal case at Criminal Docket No. 2:09-cr-105, whether he intended his Motion to be filed as a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, or whether he intended his Motion to be filed as a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Petitioner fails to return the form wi thin twenty-one (21) days, then this action will be dismissed for his failure to prosecute and his Omnibus Habeas Corpus Motion will not be filed in his criminal case at Criminal Docket No. 2:09-cr-105. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on July 26, 2013. (kcc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SPENCE v. UNITED STATES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: ROBERT R. SPENCE, JR.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?