PEREZ v. DAVISON DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, INC et al
THOMAS E. PEREZ |
GEORGE M. DAVISON and DAVISON DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, INC. |
2:2013cv01118 |
August 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Nora Barry Fischer |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration 64 was denied by Text Order dated 10/7/14 for the reasons stated more fully within. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 10/16/2014. (kas) |
Filing 60 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for the reasons stated within, the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment ([31[ and 44 ) will be denied without prejudice. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 8/20/14. (jg) |
Filing 29 MEM0RANDUM OPINION & ORDER indicating that, for the reasons stated within, Defendant George M. Davison's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 13 is denied; that Defendants George M. Davison and Davison Design & Development's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 16 is granted, in part, and denied, in part; it is granted to the extent that it seeks dismissal of claims arising prior to 1/23/11, without prejudice; it is denied in all other respects. An appropriate Order scheduling an initial case management conference shall follow. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/23/13. (jg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.