N'JAI v. US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
| JACQUELYN B. N'JAI |
| US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ANNIE HOLT, GARY BENTZ, CONNIE BENTZ and CAP LLP |
| 2:2013cv01212 |
| August 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
302
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, Defendants Gary and Connie Bentz's Motion for Summary Judgment 277 is granted in part and denied in part. Judgment will be entered in favor of the Bentz Defendants with respect to Counts I, II, and III. Judgment will be denied as to Counts V, VI and VII. Instead, Counts V, VI and VII will be dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling those claims in state court. C.A. Bentz LLC's Motion for Summary Ju dgment 267 will be granted. Judgment will be entered in favor of C.A. Bentz and against Plaintiff with respect to all counts of the Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 285 will be denied. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/22/16. (jg)
|
|
Filing
298
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, Plaintiff's Response (Docket Nos. 271 and 272 ) to Defendant C.A. Bentz LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment, to the extent same attempts to defeat summary ju dgment based upon Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), is denied; that the Court will nonetheless consider the remainder of the Response (Docket Nos. 271 and 272 ), to the extent same pertains or attempts to respond to the summary judgment motions still before the Court. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/3/16. (jg)
|
|
Filing
290
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 282 Motion in Limine to Hold a Daubert or Frye Hearing. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is granted to the extent that Plaintiff seeks the disclosures required pursuant to Rule 26(a)(2)(B)(v) - (vi); said disclosures shall be filed no later than October 7, 2016. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file a motion to place under seal those records they failed to adequately redact; said motion shall be filed no later than October 7, 2016. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other relief requested in the Motion is denied. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/29/2016. (erk)
|
|
Filing
257
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, Plaintiff's Motion for Peremptory Challenge 239 is denied; that Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration styled as her Objections to the Memorandum and Order Document 237 Filed 4/15/2016 240 is denied. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/14/16. (jg)
|
|
Filing
237
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER indicating that presently pending before the Court are several motions and requests for relief filed by pro se Plaintiff Jacquelyn B. NJai (Docket Nos. 221 - 224 ), although not formally styled as motions, Plaintiff's filings request, inter alia, that the Court: (1) strike and/or seal the Defendants' 1/4/16 Status Report; (2) enter a protective order prohibiting the Defendants from harassment, abusive subpoena practices, and unnecessarily invading Plaintiff& #039;s privacy by obtaining confidential information; (3) enter sanctions against the Defendants and their attorneys for allegedly abusive conduct; and (4) require the Defendants to answer Plaintiff's own subpoenas for documents relating to purportedly relevant discovery; that, for reasons more fully stated within said Opinion and Order, the Court will deny each of Plaintiffs requests for relief. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 4/15/16. (jg)
|
|
Filing
203
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 175 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine without prejudice to reassert her request at a later stage in these proceedings if appropriate (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/24/15. (jg)
|
|
Filing
176
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated more fully within, Defendants' Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings 156 is granted in part and denied in part. Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants with respect to the TSCA claim set forth in Count IV, Plaintiff's request for punitive damages with respect to Counts VI and VII, and Plaintiff's request for treble damages with respect to Counts I, II, V, VI and VII. Count IV is dismissed with prejudice. Defendants' motion is otherwise denied. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/1/15. (jg)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER indcating, that for reaons more fully stated within, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Original Policies from the Bentz Defendants and Financial Information 168 , is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/22/15. (jg)
|
|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that in light of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Amended Complaint 96 , the parties' respective Rule 26(f) Reports 97 , 98 , Defendants Gary and Connie Bentz's Response and Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Amended Complaint 102 , Defendant CA Bentz, LLP's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Amended Complaint 103 , and Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Response 105 , Defendants Gary and Connie Bentz's Response in Opposition 107 , their Brief in Support of same 108 , and Defendant CA Bentz, LLP's Response 110 , it is hereby ordered that Plaintiffs Motion is granted, in part, and denied, in part, as set forth within said Order; that Plaintiff shall file her Third Amended Complaint by 12/11/14. Defendants' Answers shall be filed by 1/2/15. There shall be no further motions for leave to amend and/or amendments of the complaint through the conclusion of discovery. The Court will schedule a Case Management Conference following the filing of Defendants' Answers. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/20/14. (jg)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for the reasons stated within, the Federal Defendants motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment 43 , will be granted. Because the deficiencies highlighted by this Court are incapable of being cured by way of further amendment, the dismissals shall be with prejudice. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/3/14. (jg)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORAND ORDER indicating that upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Judge Nora Barry Fischer to Recuse Herself from This and Any Other Case Involving Plaintiff 4 and accompanying Brief 5 , it is hereby ordered that said Motion is denied, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/25/13. (jg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
