ROBINSON v. ROZUM et al
JEROME ROBINSON |
GERALD ROZUM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2013cv01406 |
September 27, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Somerset |
Maureen P. Kelly |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER re (Doc. 36 ) Report and Recommendation. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, the Petition of Jerome Robinson for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 3 ) is DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Repor t and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, dated July 1, 2016, hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court, with the modifications discussed in the Memorandum Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 9/12/16. (kg) Staff Notes: A copy of the Memorandum Order filed herewith was mailed to Petitioner at his address of record via First-Class U.S. Mail. |
Filing 30 ORDER re 25 Order on Motion for Discovery, 28 Objections filed by JEROME ROBINSON. As stated more fully in the Memorandum Order, Petitioner's Objections (Doc. 28 ) are OVERRULED, and the Memorandum Order of Judge Kelly dated May 6, 2015 (Doc. 25 ) is AFFIRMED.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/11/15. (rld) Staff Note: A copy of the Memorandum Order was mailed to Petitioner at his address of record via First Class U.S. Mail. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.