EDWARDS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Western District EDWARDS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

EDWARDS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Plaintiff:	DONALD EDWARDS
Defendant:	SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number:	2:2013cv01655
Filed:	November 20, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
County:	Allegheny
Presiding Judge:	Cathy Bissoon
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 402
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 20, 2015	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9 ) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 4/20/15. (dcd)
October 30, 2014	Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 3 ) is GRANTED. All of Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice, except for his potential claim regarding the suspension of his benefits during i ncarceration, and that claim is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before 11/14/14, limited to Plaintiff's challenge regarding the suspension of his benefits during incarcerati on. Should Plaintiff not timely file an amended complaint, the dismissal of that claim likewise will be converted to a dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 10/30/14. Staff note: a copy of this Memorandum and Order will be sent, via First-Class U.S. Mail, to Plaintiff's address of record on 10/31/14. (dcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 20, 2015

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9 ) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 4/20/15. (dcd)

October 30, 2014

Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 3 ) is GRANTED. All of Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice, except for his potential claim regarding the suspension of his benefits during i ncarceration, and that claim is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before 11/14/14, limited to Plaintiff's challenge regarding the suspension of his benefits during incarcerati on. Should Plaintiff not timely file an amended complaint, the dismissal of that claim likewise will be converted to a dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 10/30/14. Staff note: a copy of this Memorandum and Order will be sent, via First-Class U.S. Mail, to Plaintiff's address of record on 10/31/14. (dcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EDWARDS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: DONALD EDWARDS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?