VAN TASSEL v. PICCIONE et al
Plaintiff: LYNN A. VAN TASSEL
Defendant: CLYDE JONES, BRIAN COVERT, JAMES R. JENDRYSIK, THOMAS M. PICCIONE, FRANK NOONAN and JOSHUA LAMANCUSA
Case Number: 2:2013cv01672
Filed: November 21, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Lawrence
Presiding Judge: Nora Barry Fischer
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for all of the reasons stated within said Opinion, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 35 is denied. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 7/10/14. (jg)
May 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for all of the reasons stated within, the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Piccione 11 , Covert, Jendrysik and Lamancusa 13 , Noonan 16 , and Jones 28 are each granted. The federal claims set forth in C ounts I-III of Plaintiffs complaint are each dismissed, with prejudice. The state law claims set forth in Counts IV-VII of Plaintiffs complaint are dismissed, without prejudice. As each of Plaintiff's claims has been dismissed, the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 5/12/14. (jg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VAN TASSEL v. PICCIONE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CLYDE JONES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIAN COVERT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES R. JENDRYSIK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THOMAS M. PICCIONE
Represented By: Michael P. Daley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANK NOONAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOSHUA LAMANCUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LYNN A. VAN TASSEL
Represented By: Lynn A. Van Tassel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?