EQUITRANS SERVICES LLC et al v. PRECISION PIPELINE, LLC
| EQUITRANS SERVICES LLC and EQUITRANS INVESTMENTS, LLC |
| PRECISION PIPELINE, LLC |
| PRECISION PIPELINE, LLC |
| EQUITRANS INVESTMENTS, LLC and EQUITRANS SERVICES LLC |
| 2:2013cv01727 |
| December 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER. For the reasons stated more fully in the Order filed herewith, Plaintiffs' Motion for Clarification and/or Reconsideration (Doc. 67 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 2/11/16. (jwr)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, IT IS ORDERED that Equitrans's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 36 ) will be GRANTED insofar as it relates to Precision's counterclaims for breach of contract and Equi trans's alleged violations of the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act. In all other respects, Equitrans's motion will be DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Precision's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 40 ) will be GRAN TED with respect to the breach of contract claims asserted in Count I of the Complaint that are not founded on breach of warranty or indemnity theories. With respect to the breach of warranty claim in Count II of the Complaint, Precision's moti on will be GRANTED as to the slides numbered 20 through 29 in Precision's Exhibit 9 (Doc. 43 -31) and pertaining to the Shultz, Marling, Ankrom, Raymont, Tennant, Minor, Efaw, and Fairbanks properties as well as Mileposts 0.26-0.53 and 0.33 at Underwood property. With respect to the indemnity claim in Count III of the Complaint, Precision's motion will be GRANTED as to all claims premised exclusively on Equitrans's first party losses and/or any losses incurred relative to the aforementioned slides numbered 20 through 29 in Precision's Exhibit 9 (Doc. 43 -31). In all other respects, Precision's motion for partial summary judgment will be DENIED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/31/15. (jwr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
