GABRIEL v. GIANT EAGLE, INC. et al
Plaintiff: ANDREW M. GABRIEL
Defendant: GIANT EAGLE, INC., MARCKISOTTO MARKETS INC., SHAKESPEARE STREET ASSOCIATES GP LLC and CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Case Number: 2:2014cv00980
Filed: July 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Maureen P. Kelly
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, defendants' motions to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (ECF Nos. 30 , 34 ) are GRANTED and plaintiff's objections to the report and recommendation (ECF No. 45 ) are OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that the complaint filed by Andrew M. Gabriel is dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that the report and recommendation (ECF No. 44 ) as supplemented by the accompanying memorandum opinion is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED; and It is further ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/19/2015. (smc)
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER adopting as the opinion of the court 24 Report and Recommendations as supplemented by the accompanying memorandum opinion; denying 3 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 12/12/2014. (smc )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GABRIEL v. GIANT EAGLE, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANDREW M. GABRIEL
Represented By: Brian Samuel Malkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GIANT EAGLE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARCKISOTTO MARKETS INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHAKESPEARE STREET ASSOCIATES GP LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Represented By: Sarah C. Yerger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?