WAINWRIGHT et al v. CITY OF SHARON et al
Plaintiff: |
SHAQUAN WAINWRIGHT and JAMAAL RICHBERG |
Defendant: |
CITY OF SHARON, DANIEL MCEVOY, MARC ANTHONY ADAMO and EDWARD STABILE |
Case Number: |
2:2014cv01212 |
Filed: |
September 8, 2014 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Office: |
Pittsburgh Office |
County: |
Mercer |
Presiding Judge: |
Nora Barry Fischer |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
March 29, 2016 |
Filing
141
ORDER indicating that upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Compliance with Rule 33 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26.2(c) and for Sanctions Under Rule 37 and exhibits attached thereto 36 , it is here by ordered that Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel is granted, in part, and denied, in part. Defendant City of Sharon shall supplement its answers to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories and responses to Plaintiffs First Set of Requests for P roduction by 4/29/16 (details more fully stated in said Order); that Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel responses to Plaintiffs' Request Nos. 8 and 10 as they pertain to Defendants Stabile, McEvoy, and Adamo is granted, in part, denied, in part. Defendants Stabile, McEvoy, and Adamo shall produce all non-privileged documents responsive to Plaintiffs' Request Nos. 8 and 10 by 4/29/16. Defendants Stabile, McEvoy, and Adamo shall produce a privilege log for any allegedly privileged docume nts responsive to Plaintiffs' Request Nos. 8 and 10, and produce said documents to the Court for review, in camera, by 4/29/16 at 5:00 p.m.; that Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel response to Plaintiffs' Second Set of Requests for Producti on to Defendant City of Sharon, (Docket No. 36 at 22), is granted. Defendant City of Sharon shall serve full and complete responses by 4/29/16. To the extent that Plaintiffs and their counsel challenge the sufficiency of Defendants' production , they shall meet and confer with defense counsel by 5/6/16. Any motion to compel shall be filed by 5/13/16; that Plaintiffs' motion for reasonable expenses, (Docket No. 36 at 23), is denied (see said Order for further details). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/29/16. (jg)
|
January 11, 2016 |
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint in Response to Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 57 is granted; An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 1/11/16. (jg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?