JEFFERS v. CITY OF WASHINGTON et al
CARMELLA JEFFERS |
CITY OF WASHINGTON, RON MCINTYRE, LINDA CARROZZA and JENNIFER L. CARROZZA |
2:2014cv01361 |
October 7, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Washington |
Joy Flowers Conti |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 48 Order to Show Cause, 49 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by CARMELLA JEFFERS. For the reasons set forth in this memorandum opinion, the court concludes that plaintiff failed to show cause why the motion to dismiss should not be granted. Consequently, the court will grant the City defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 43 ), dismiss plaintiff's federal claims at Counts 1 and 2 of the amended complaint with prejudice, and dismiss plaintiff's rema ining state law claims without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). Because no claims remain, the court will deny as moot the motion to strike (ECF No. 38 ) and motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 46 ) filed by defendants Linda and Jennifer Carrozza. The court will order this case closed. An appropriate order will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 12/11/2015. (bgm) |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by RON MCINTYRE, CITY OF WASHINGTON. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/13/2015. (blr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.