DAVIS v. GRABER et al
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR. |
LYLE GRABER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. |
2:2014cv01416 |
October 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Maureen P. Kelly |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' 45 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly's 57 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is further ORDERED tha t, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(l) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order, a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 1/18/17. (bdb) |
Filing 32 ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that 18 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as contained herein. It is further ORDERED that 25 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. Plaintiff is hereby granted leave to file, on or before 4/21/16, a Second Amended Complaint as to the claims in Counts II and VI which are dismissed without prejudice by this Order. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 3/31/16. (bdb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.