THOMPSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
| LYNNE THOMPSON |
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2014cv01563 |
| November 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Maureen P. Kelly |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by LYNNE THOMPSON, is DENIED, as is a Certificate of Appealability, and re 32 MOTION for Wrongful Incarceration MOTION for Compensation MOTION for Hearing filed by LY NNE THOMPSON, 31 MOTION for fraud of Order of Court filed by LYNNE THOMPSON, 30 MOTION for compensation from wrongful incarceration forthwith filed by LYNNE THOMPSON, 29 MOTION to Compel Fraud and interference filed by LYNNE THOMPSON , and 28 MOTION to show total disregard for proper procedures with violations of civil and Constitution rights filed by LYNNE THOMPSON, are denied as moot for the most part, as stated more fully in the Opinion, given that the Petition is denied. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10/15/2015. A copy of the Memorandum Order is being sent to Petitioner at her address of record via First Class Mail. (tmr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
