ZAYLER v. POSTEL et al
| DCK/TTEC, LLC |
| MICHAEL W. POSTEL, SR., POSTEL INDUSTRIES, INC., POSTEL HOLDINGS, LLC, POSTEL BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC, POSTEL ERECTION GROUP, L.L.C., POSTEL INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C., POSTEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., POSTEL-WEST, INC., POLK COUNTY EQUIPMENT, INC., AMERISTEEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., AMERISTEEL MANUFACTURING, INC., POSTEL HOLDINGS II, L.L.C., POSTEL-MCALLEN, L.L.C., POSTEL HOLDINGS III, L.L.C., ADAMS STREET HOLDINGS, L.L.C., POSTEL ADAMS, L.L.C., POSTEL-RB MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., POSTEL GROUP, INC., POSTEL STEEL VENTURES, L.L.C., INNERSTAFF, INC., POSTEL HOLDINGS, IV, L.L.C. and DOES 1 THROUGH 10 |
| 2:2014cv01739 |
| December 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER denying 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum filed contemporaneously herewith, Defendants' Final Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 55 ) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 7/21/2015. (rld)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER on 32 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Transfer Venue. For the reasons contained in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, Transfer Venue (Doc. 32 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 5/14/15. (rld)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
