NEIGHBORS v. MONAHAN et al
| BOBBI JO NEIGHBORS |
| WILLIAM MONAHAN, MONONGAHELA TOWNSHIP and MONONGAHELA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS |
| 2:2015cv00502 |
| April 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Greene |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum filed contemporaneously herewith, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule 12(b)(6) or, in the Alternative, Motion to Strike Portions of the Complaint Purs uant to Federal Rule 12(f) (Doc. 9 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. With regard to Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim in Count III of the Complaint, the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9 ) is DENIED as that claim relates to Defenda nts Monahan and Monongahela Township. In every other respect, the Motion (Doc. 9 ) will be GRANTED. The following claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: all of Plaintiff's claims against the Monongahela Township Board of Supervisors as s et forth in Counts I through IV of the Complaint; Plaintiff's substantive due process claim in Count IV of the Complaint as it relates to all Defendants; Plaintiff's claim under Section 1983 for punitive damages against Monongahela Township ; and Plaintiff's abuse of process claim in Count II of the Complaint as it relates to Defendant Monongahela Township. The following claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims against Defendant Monahan and Mon ongahela Township for malicious prosecution (Count I); and Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Monahan for abuse of process (Count II). Pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff may file an amended pleading as a matter of course on or before March 23, 2016, consistent with the principles discussed in the Memorandum filed herewith and the mandates of Rule 11. Failure to file an amended complaint by this date will result in these claims being dismissed with prejudice. Defendants' Motion, in the Alternative, to Strike Portions of the Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. 9 ) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 3/15/16. (rld)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
