WESTERFIELD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Western District WESTERFIELD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

WESTERFIELD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

Petitioner:	RONNY WESTERFIELD
Respondent:	COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number:	2:2015cv00634
Filed:	May 15, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
County:	Montgomery
Presiding Judge:	Lisa Pupo Lenihan
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 24, 2018	Filing 42 MEMORANDUM & ORDER dismissing as untimely 3 the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and denying a Certificate of Appealability. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed. Petitioner has thirty (30) days in which to file a Notice of Appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on July 24, 2018. (kcc)
June 21, 2018	Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND SHOW CAUSE ORDER re 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by RONNY WESTERFIELD. On or before July 20, 2018, Petitioner may file a response to this Court's Memorandum and show cause why his claims should not be dismissed for failure to file them within the one-year limitations period. On or before that same date, Respondents may submit a response setting forth their position. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on June 21, 2018. (kcc)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 24, 2018

Filing 42 MEMORANDUM & ORDER dismissing as untimely 3 the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and denying a Certificate of Appealability. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed. Petitioner has thirty (30) days in which to file a Notice of Appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on July 24, 2018. (kcc)

June 21, 2018

Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND SHOW CAUSE ORDER re 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by RONNY WESTERFIELD. On or before July 20, 2018, Petitioner may file a response to this Court's Memorandum and show cause why his claims should not be dismissed for failure to file them within the one-year limitations period. On or before that same date, Respondents may submit a response setting forth their position. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on June 21, 2018. (kcc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WESTERFIELD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: RONNY WESTERFIELD
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?