RICHTER v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
| SERENA RICHTER |
| PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JOHN P. WEAVER, GINO FAGNILLI, ROBERT F. WILSON and JACK R. HENEKS, JR. |
| 2:2015cv00775 |
| June 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Fayette |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
134
MEMORANDUM ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the filing at this docket entry, Heneks' Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Judgment of Acquittal (Doc. 99 ) is DENIED. Heneks' Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Psychiatric of P hysical Injury (Doc. 101 ) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Heneks' Motion in Limine to Preclude Expert Opinion Testimony of Dr. Cyril Wecht (Doc. 103 ) is GRANTED. Heneks' Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Past or Future Wage Loss (Doc. 105 ) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Heneks' Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence or Testimony of Loss of Employment (Doc. 107 ) is DENIED. Weaver's Motion in Limine (First) to Exclude Evidence and Testimony on Certain Damages (Doc. 109 ) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Weaver's Motion in Limine (Second) to Exclude Evidence and Testimony on Criminal Defense Attorney Fees and Costs (Doc. 111 ) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Weave r's Motion in Limine (Third) to Exclude Evidence and Testimony on Judgment of Acquittal in Underlying Criminal Proceeding (Doc. 113 ) is DENIED. Weaver's Motion in Limine (Fourth) to Exclude the Testimony and Report of Plaintiffs Expert, Cyril Wecht (Doc. 115 ) is GRANTED. Defendants' Joint Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Supplemental Pretrial Statement (Doc. 130 ) is GRANTED. See contents of this filing.. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/4/18. (rdl)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 69 Motion for Summary Judgment. The PSP Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 69 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, the Motion is granted as to the false arrest claims ag ainst Gino Fagnilli and Robert F. Wilson and as to the malicious prosecution claim against John P. Weaver, and denied as to the remaining false arrest claim against John P. Weaver. See contents of this filing. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/14/18. (rdl)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 61 Defendant Jack R. Heneks's Motion for Summary Judgment. See contents of this filing. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 3/22/18. (rdl)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM ORDER. Consistent with the Memorandum Order filed herewith, Defendant Heneks's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 25 ) will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART and the PSP Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 27 ) will be GRANTED IN PAR T and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, Count I is PARTIALLY DISMISSED as to D.A. Heneks insofar Plaintiff's Claim for False Arrest is not based on D.A. Heneks's conduct that constituted administrative or investigative actions. Count II is DI SMISSED as to D.A. Heneks and Troopers Wilson and Fagnilli, without prejudice. Should Plaintiff, consistent with Rule 11, wish to file an amended complaint as to Count II against Troopers Wilson and Fagnilli, that amended complaint shall be filed no later than October 7, 2016. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 9/29/16. (jwr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
