ST. GERMAIN v. WISNIEWSKI et al
||PATRICK ST. GERMAIN
||RAYMOND WISNIEWSKI, NUTRIMOST LLC and NUTRIMOST DOCTORS, LLC
||September 30, 2015
||US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
||XX US, Outside State
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 17, 2017
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order filed herewith, Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 26 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 26 ) is DENIED as moot insofar as Defendant s seek to dismiss Count VII, which the Court has construed as a request for an equitable remedy, and GRANTED in all other respects. Defendant Dr. Raymond Wisniewski is hereby DISMISSED from this action. The remaining Defendants shall file an answer to the surviving counts (Counts I, II, and IV) in the Amended Complaint (Doc. 23 ) on or before January 31, 2017. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 1/17/2017. (kg)
|August 5, 2016
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, the Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion (Doc. 9 ) is DENIED insofar as it seeks dismissal of Count IV for unjust enrichment aga inst Defendant Nutrimost Doctors. As stated in the Memorandum Order, the Court construes Plaintiff's Count VIII for equitable relief as a request for an equitable remedy for the remaining claims, but not as a separate cause of action. Insofar as Defendants seek to dismiss Count VIII, the motion is DENIED. In all other respects, the motion (Doc. 9 ) is GRANTED. Consistent with the foregoing, the following claims are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing an amended compla int in light of the discussions set forth in the Memorandum Order: Count III; Count V; Count VI; and Count VII. Plaintiff may file an amended pleading as a matter of course on or before August 15, 2016, consistent with the principles discussed in the Memorandum Order and the mandates of Rule 11. Failure to file an amended complaint by this date will result in these claims being dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 8/5/16. (rld)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?