EVERETT v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI FAYETTE et al
| JEVON A. EVERETT |
| SUPERINTENDENT, SCI FAYETTE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2015cv01639 |
| December 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Fayette |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER denying 43 Motion for Relief of Judgment; adopting 44 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Motion for Relief of Judgment 43 is DENIED, a certificate of appealability is DENIED and the R&R 44 is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 8/22/2023. (sps)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER adopting 39 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's 38 Motion for Relief of Judgment is DENIED, and the R&R is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 3/14/22. (cyk)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER. After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19 ) and the Objections thereto (Doc. 20 ), it hereby is ORDERED that Petitioner's habeas petition (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED; a certificate of appealability is DENIED; and the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19 ) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the District Court. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/13/18. (wss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
