HOOPER v. SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC. et al
| KEITH HOOPER |
| SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC. and CLEAN HARBORS, INC. |
| THOMAS L. COOPER |
| 2:2016cv00123 |
| January 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Erie |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
175
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants motion requesting oral argument, in which Plaintiff does not concur 171 , is DENIED; 2. Defendants motions for summary judgment 153 , 155 are DENIED; and 3. A status conference is scheduled in the above -captioned action for September 25, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. The Court prefers to conduct this conference by telephone. Plaintiffs counsel shall initiate the call. The telephone number of the Court is 717-221-3990. Signed by Judge Yvette Kane on 9/18/18. (ve-pamd)
|
|
Filing
132
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel the Discovery Deposition of Alan McKim is granted (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/23/17. (jg)
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, based on the reasons stated within, the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. (b)(2) on behalf of defendant Clean Harbors, Inc. 42 is denied. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/13/16. (jg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
