TALLEY v. KING et al
| QUINTEZ TALLEY |
| R. C/O KING and ORBASH |
| 2:2016cv00152 |
| February 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Greene |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
ORDER re 126 Notice filed by QUINTEZ TALLEY. Plaintiff's request is granted and it is ORDERED that the time for Plaintiff to file an appeal is extended under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) to allow the filing of his appeal nunc pro tunc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 2/23/2018. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
123
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 115 MOTION for New Trial filed by QUINTEZ TALLEY. See Memorandum Opinion for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 1/4/2018. (sms)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 23 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. This case will proceed on Plaintiff's claims against Defendant King for excessive force and assault and battery and on Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Orbash for failure to protect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 5/18/2017. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 17 MOTION for Non-Party Prisoner Witnesses to Attend His Deposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 7/27/2016. (jlh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
